Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creation"

From L'avenir de l'humanité
(Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)
 
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Alive said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman.
 +
 +
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 21:45, 27 May 2012

Comments on Creation <comments />


Alive said ...

Saying that Creation is Creation is as fascinating as saying Batman is Batman.

---- M -- 17:30, 27 May 2012 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

I see your point but "Creation is Creation" was not mentioned in the article. "Creation is The Creation" means something useful, it implies that there is a uniqueness about it. Every Creation is unique? I've read that there are many Creations and the first one that created itself is the Absolute Absolutum. How it created itself such a long time ago, using the finest energy from the Absolute Nothing is something I cannot understand and probably won't for a few billion years.

--Jamesm 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)

Alive said ...

I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman.

---- M -- 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)