Difference between revisions of "Talk:Broken/Will Humanity Wake Up\x85In Time\x3f"

From L'avenir de l'humanité
(Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Daniel - via ArticleComments extension)
 
Line 35: Line 35:
  
 
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 23:38, 27 August 2011 (BST)
 
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 23:38, 27 August 2011 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Daniel said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
I found yet another corroboration, only problem is I cannot remember what contact report I read it from. It said something to the effect of:" people will not support the judgements of the courts ". I just cannot remember which contact report I read it from if anyone could help. Here's the story that is running on all the major UK Television news networks today and here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/26/tory-attorney-general-remand-policy
 +
 +
--[[User:Daniel|Daniel]] 16:55, 29 August 2011 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 15:55, 29 August 2011

Comments on Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time? <comments />


Hawaiian said ...

Excellent summary report showing previously established scientific information by Billy Meier via the Plejarens which later proved correct by Earth scientists proves beyond a doubt of the validity of BEAM's materials.

However for the purpose of easier knowledge access and researching for those not familiar or just curious or have other interests that may be linked, it would be advisable to instead of listing this material by sequential Corroborated numbers, why not put a short descriptive title next to it so that people will know or become interested to investigate further? Same as the Contact Notes

--Hawaiian 23:34, 25 August 2011 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

Great idea, will do.

Thanks,

James

--Jamesm 17:33, 27 August 2011 (BST)

Hawaiian said ...

Aloha Jamesm,

Much appreciation for your hard work in presenting this most important information to English speaking people around the world. You and others supporting this website such as Mr. Moore and others have contributed a vast amount of relative materials which are also evolving further as we speak and engage amongst those that seek the truth.

Much appreciation to all that read and input their comments even if it sometimes appear "off the wall" at times. I try to steer some to this site when I know their questions will be better answered if they browse on their own and only reference particular items of special interests to their specific concerns.

Keep up the excellent work as I too learn each time I browse through this as well and begin to find more "connections" amongst Contact Reports and other materials posted by others.

--Hawaiian 23:38, 27 August 2011 (BST)

Daniel said ...

I found yet another corroboration, only problem is I cannot remember what contact report I read it from. It said something to the effect of:" people will not support the judgements of the courts ". I just cannot remember which contact report I read it from if anyone could help. Here's the story that is running on all the major UK Television news networks today and here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/aug/26/tory-attorney-general-remand-policy

--Daniel 16:55, 29 August 2011 (BST)