Talk:Chupacabra
Comments on Chupacabra <comments />
Jamesm said ...
Zameen said ...
it certainly seems as such.:)
--Zameen 21:02, 6 September 2010 (BST)
Markvd said ...
Doesn't Billy have a pal on Earth known as Gilgamesh that can transform into a giant version of the aformentioned chupacabra and make them disappear if hostile abracadabra.:)I think we need universal wildlife security pronto.
--Markvd 05:02, 7 September 2010 (BST)
Sheila said ...
I would think it would be more dangerous for the chupacabra, if men were to know the truth.
--Sheila 15:43, 7 September 2010 (BST)
Benjamin Stevens said ...
I guess it depends on what is meant by the fact that Billy "knows about" them. It could simply mean that he knows what the questioner is talking about, since Billy himself has seen or otherwise knows about the videos of them on TV. If that is all that he knows, then he "cannot" answer the questions because he himself has no precise knowledge of the creatures. The fact that the creatures are described as "those ape-like creatures from TV" does make it seem that he only knows about them from T.V. and not from any other source. Nevertheless, if the "cannot" does mean that he has detailed information about them but is not allowed to reveal any of it, then that makes me want to look into the chupacabra a whole lot more!
--βενιαμιν 18:28, 7 September 2010 (BST)
Hawaiian said ...
I have to agree with Benjamin Stevens that at this time Billy is not allowed to clarify this question. On a number of occasions, the Plejarens have put a lid on what BEAM can and cannot say, either because it is dangerous for him and others or Earth humans are not evolved enough to grasp the truth.
Could the Chupacabra be related to those similar in description, (especially the red fluorescent eyes) of those who were present in Jmmanuel’s cave? When Mary, Jmmanuel’s mother tried to touch these Beings, but was warned not too because it was too dangerous for her to do so.
--Hawaiian 20:04, 7 September 2010 (BST)
Does Billy's answer mean that to know the answer is too dangerous for mankind at this time?
--Jamesm 19:00, 6 September 2010 (BST)